不过不是我不愿意去LSAT区 那里实在是太冷清啦 根本没答复啊 还是把题目贴一边 希望版主可以帮帮忙 Partly because of bad weather, but also partly beacuse some major pepper growers have switeched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.
Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that
A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial C) supperlies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously.
请问"the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched"应该作何理解？
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-2-20 18:13:00
楼主
