- UID
- 901880
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-6-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
推理1:核污染对周围居民的生活没有影响 不在人口稠密区设置核电站是没有意义的
推理2 但是,政策指出要把核污染排在距离人口密集区远的地方 推理1有问题
注意推理2才是选项问的argument,推理1只是sub-argument。。。
Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument?
(A)Evacuation plants in the event of an accident could not be guaranteed to work perfectly except where the population is small.
Evacuation plants是不是working perfectly和题目讨论的dumping nuclear power无关
(B) In the event of an accident, it is certain that fewer people would be harmed in a sparsely populated than in a densely populated area. 削弱推理1,加强推理2
(C) Dumping of nuclear waste poses fewer economic and bureaucratic problems in sparsely populated than in densely populated areas.
人口稀疏地区比人口稠密地区因为核污染产生的经济和治理问题少,而不是由于安全问题的考虑要排在人口稀疏的地区,是他因。
(D) There are dangers associated with chemical waste, and it, too, is dumped away from areas of dense population. 无关
(E) Until there is no shred(少量的) of doubt(enough certainty) that nuclear dumps are safe, it makes sense to situate them where they pose the least threat to the public.
削弱推理1,加强推理2
|
|