ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 992|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

63篇第37篇

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-9-20 20:34:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
(This passage was excerpted from materialwritten in 1990.)
As the economic role ofmultinational, global corporations expands,the international economic environment will be shaped increasingly not bygovernments or international institutions, but by the interaction betweengovernments and global corporations, especially in the United States, Europe,and Japan. A significant factor in this shifting worldeconomy is the trend toward regional trading blocs of nations, which hasa potentially large effect on the evolution of the world trading system. Twoexamples of this trend are the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA)and Europe 1992, the move by the European Community (EC) to dismantleimpediments to the free flow of goods, services, capital, and labor amongmember states by the end of 1992. However, although numerous politicaland economic factors were operative in launching the move to integrate the EC’smarkets, concern about protectionism within the EC does not appear to have beena major consideration. This is in sharp contrast to the FTA; the overwhelmingreason for that bilateral initiative was fear of increasing United Statesprotectionism. Nonetheless, although markedly different in origin and nature,both regional developments are highly significant in that they will fosterintegration in the two largest and richest markets of the world, as well asprovoke questions about the future direction of the world trading system.

6.    Theauthor discusses the FTA and Europe 1992 most likely in order to
(A)point out the similarities between two seemingly disparate trading alliances
(B) illustrate how different economicmotivations produce different types of trading blocs
(C) provide contrasting examples of a trend that is influencing theworld economy
(D) identify the most importantcharacteristics of successful economic integration
(E) trace the history ofregional trading blocs


答案为什么是C 呢 D为什么不对。如果是C的话为什么要强调 contrasting
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-10-6 23:54:46 | 只看该作者
其实C选项没有强调contrasting,只是陈述。这两个例子一个是因为害怕保护主义而生,另一个与保护主义无关,所以Contrast。
作者讨论FTA与Europe1992的目的并不是要说明世界经济整合的重要特点,而是举例说明前文的trend到底是什么。逻辑上C更加通顺。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 12:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部