ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1986|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 13 CR 88

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-8 16:04:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
88.Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for developmentloans. To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-taxstructure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger portion oftheir incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money isdeposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

(A)When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing alwaysincreases correspondingly.

(B)The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result ofbusiness expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal incometaxes during the first year of the plan.

(C)Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increasetheir levels of retirement savings.

(D)Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whoseprospective earnings are insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.

(E)The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of theirincomes, the same tax savings for a given increase in their retirement savings.


想问下C选项不是也可以质疑government plan吗?
是因为,如果总数达到了,即使这部分人不愿意投入到养老金账户也不影响吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-6-9 11:23:29 | 只看该作者
C意味着还是有一部分人会把钱放到养老账户的,只要有一个人放一块钱,对于政府的计划来说也是成功的,因为money available还是增加了,因此不是削弱。
另外我有一个观点,在GMAT里不将整体分离,因此出现some的选项基本都是有问题的,因为结论不确定,简单来说,GMAT只考
“所有chasedream会员都能考700+,我是chasedream的会员,我也能考700+”而不考“部分(some)所有chasedream会员都能考700+,我是chasedream的会员。。。”的情形,因为结论不确定。
至今在OG OGverbal 和GWD上还没看到例外。
望指正
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-10 09:02:34 | 只看该作者
感谢~说的很明白啊!!
地板
发表于 2014-9-26 11:08:52 | 只看该作者
讲得好!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 19:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部