- UID
- 923494
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-8-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
there is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officiallly confirmed before being published .there is a system in place before confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings,namely ,the replication of results by other scientists .poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists ,which can include anything from careless reporting parctice to fraud , is not harmful .it wil be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results .
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
A. Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
B. Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
C. Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
D. In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
E. Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.
这道题的思路是什么？尽管可以通过排除做，但是A选项的逻辑链不懂啊，有木有人解答下，感激不尽!
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2014-8-16 22:28:11
收藏
收藏
