ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7605|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-Q30

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-2 21:42:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD7-Q30:
Printwell’s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use.Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased.Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers.Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer.Thus, despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?



A.Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell’s printers only accept Printwell’s ink cartridges.

B.Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers’ costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers’ ultimate retail price.

C.Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.

D.In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase in unit sales of printers as Printwell has.

E.In the past year, sales of Printwell’s ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell.

答案A 求解释~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-2 22:17:36 | 只看该作者
题干说Monthly revenues from Printwell’s ink-jet printers 没有increase, 但是the Ink Jet Division 不光生产Printwell’s ink-jet printers 还生产 the ink cartridges ,那么如果 the revenues from  the ink cartridges 增加了的话,那么 就可以推翻the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to.

A说 Printwell’s ink-jet printers(A) 只能接受Printwell’s ink cartridges(B),换句话说你用了A后就必须使用B,那么题干说A的销量在增加,这样必然带动B的销量增加,B的增加可能带来此部门收益的增加。
不知道你懂了没?呵呵~
板凳
发表于 2011-6-2 23:07:53 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-2 23:33:04 | 只看该作者
感谢LS两位~ 还有个问题~Printwell’s ink cartridges 的增加不一定带来利润的增加啊?
5#
发表于 2011-6-2 23:40:04 | 只看该作者
LZ看选项中这部分Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, ,注意frequently,经常需要换ink,所以卖出一个printer带动的ink的增加应该是很大的,而且文中没有提到ink的价格和成本问题,所以我们可以assume一般情况下,卖的越多自然是收入越高的,所以成功削弱了文中的结论
6#
发表于 2011-6-3 08:00:23 | 只看该作者
感谢LS两位~ 还有个问题~Printwell’s ink cartridges 的增加不一定带来利润的增加啊?
-- by 会员 nysen (2011/6/2 23:33:04)


你的问题在理,销量的增加不一定利润就增加~但是题目是most weaken the argument,那么A选项是所有里面最好的一个!即使它may not weaken the argument。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-3 12:22:56 | 只看该作者
可是D选项说,P已经是行业里增长的最快了,所以不用削弱部门,不也能weaken么?
8#
发表于 2011-6-3 17:57:51 | 只看该作者
D选项的对比的对象是错误的,不用看具体的就排除了~题干要你weaken的是the Ink Jet Division 在现在与它自己以前的revenue 的对比,对比的对象是the Ink Jet Division是它本身, 而D说 P已经是行业里增长的最快了,那是P行业与其他行业之间的比较,和 Division 的收入在不同时期的变化无关。所以D排除~不知道这样说你理解没?
9#
发表于 2011-6-3 18:00:33 | 只看该作者
换句话说,P已经是行业里增长最快的了,也不能保证目前的division收入就比以前的少。
10#
发表于 2011-6-3 18:01:25 | 只看该作者
少改成多,不好意思~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-8 04:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部