ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2326|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]GWD3-6~7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-24 19:28:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]GWD3-6~7

   In American Genesis, which covers

       the century of technological innovation

       in the United States beginning in 1876,

Line       Thomas Hughes assigns special promi-

  (5)      nence to Thomas Edison as archetype

of the independent nineteenth-century

inventor.  However, Hughes virtually

ignores Edison’s famous contem-

porary and notorious adversary in

 (10)      the field of electric light and power,

George Westinghouse.  This com-

parative neglect of Westinghouse is

consistent with other recent historians’

works, although it marks an intriguing

 (15)      departure from the prevailing view

during the inventors’ lifetimes (and for

decades afterward) of Edison and

Westinghouse as the two “pioneer

innovators” of the electrical industry.

 (20)           My recent reevaluation of Westing-

       house, facilitated by materials found

       in railroad archives, suggests that

while Westinghouse and Edison shared

important traits as inventors, they

 (25)      differed markedly in their approach to

the business aspects of innovation.

For Edison as an inventor, novelty

was always paramount:  the overriding

goal of the business of innovation was

 (30)      simply to generate funding for new

inventions.  Edison therefore undertook

just enough sales, product development,

       and manufacturing to accomplish this.

Westinghouse, however, shared the

 (35)      attitudes of the railroads and other

industries for whom he developed

innovations:  product development,

standardization, system, and order

were top priorities.  Westinghouse

 (40)      thus better exemplifies the systematic

approach to technological development

that would become a hallmark of modern

corporate research and development.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6:
                

According to the passage, Edison’s chief concern as an inventor was the

             

  1. availability of a commercial market
  2. costs of developing a prototype
  3. originality of his inventions
  4. maintenance of high standards throughout production
  5. generation of enough profits to pay for continued marketing

答案是C,我选了B,因为文中说the overriding goal of the business of innovation was simply to generate funding for new inventions。我的理解是爱迪生只考虑做原型prototype 所需的费用,不考虑市场化

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q7:

The author of the passage implies that the shift away from the views of Westinghouse’s contemporaries should be regarded as

 

  1. a natural outgrowth of the recent revival of interest in Edison
  2. a result of scholarship based on previously unknown documents
  3. reflective of modern neglect of the views of previous generations
  4. inevitable, given the changing trends in historical interpretations
  5. surprising, given the stature that Westinghouse once had

答案是E, 我的答案是A,因为文中说This comparative neglect of Westinghouse is consistent with other recent historians’ works, although it marks an intriguing departure from the prevailing view during the inventors’ lifetimes ,既然cinsistent with other recent historians’ works,不是很natural吗

 

到底怎么回事,恳请大家帮帮我 

沙发
发表于 2013-5-5 11:14:08 | 只看该作者
linyqiong 发表于 2009-2-24 19:28
   In American Genesis, which covers       the century of te ...

我觉得这句话应该定位到文中第一段,consist with other recent historians,although...注意这里有个转折词,转折词后面就是当时contemporary的看法,而现在的看法与当时的看法不一样(现在忽略了),看法不同,以及转折词although的出现,可以看出来这是surprise的;
板凳
发表于 2013-11-16 15:55:42 | 只看该作者
linyqiong 发表于 2009-2-24 19:28
   In American Genesis, which covers       the century of te ...

虽然问题很久远了。。。但还是回答一下自己的观点 也许能帮助到其他人~
这题我也做错了,做的时候瞎选了一个,被题目搞得云里雾里的。
后来仔细看了一下 关键是对这段话的理解:This comparative neglect of Westinghouse is consistent with other recent historians’ works, although it marks an intriguing departure from the prevailing view during the inventors’ lifetimes (and for decades afterward) of Edison and Westinghouse as the two “pioneer innovators ” of the electrical industry.
也就是说作者对Thomas Hughes有褒有贬,一方面TH跟以前的人(W‘s contemporary)相比,观点是有趣的背离的,另一方面,Th的观点还是跟现代的历史学家想法一样忽视了W的贡献。

题目“The author of the passage implies that the shift away from the views of Westinghouse’s contemporaries should be regarded as” 意思是 “作者认为 TH观点与W’s contemporary相比的转变是怎么样的”,很显然,这是指作者对TH观点的其中一种看法:“it marks an intriguing departure from the prevailing view during the inventors’ lifetimes”
五个选项里best就是E了,surprising, given the stature that Westinghouse once had,”在W当时的地位来说,这种观念的转变是令人惊讶的“ surprising对应 intriguing
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-9 08:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部