ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1790|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-7-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-9 11:58:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-7-10

GWD-7-Q10 to GWD-7-Q12:


      Linda Kerber argued in the mid-


        1980’s that after the American Revolution


        (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican


Line        motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-


  (5)        cational opportunities for women in the


United States.  Kerber maintained that


the leaders of the new nation wanted


women to be educated in order to raise


politically virtuous sons.  A virtuous citi-


(10)        zenry was considered essential to the


success of the country’s republican form


of government; virtue was to be instilled


not only by churches and schools, but


by families, where the mother’s role


(15)        was crucial.  Thus, according to Kerber,


motherhood became pivotal to the fate


of the republic, providing justification for


an unprecedented attention to female


education.


(20)              Introduction of the republican moth-


        erhood thesis dramatically changed


        historiography.  rior to Kerber’s work,


educational historians barely mentioned


women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929


(25)        work is the notable exception.  Examining


newspaper advertisements for acade-


mies, Woody found that educational


opportunities increased for both girls


and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An


(30)        Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting


a shift in view, Woody also claimed that


practical education for females had


many advocates before the Revolution.


Woody’s evidence challenges the notion


(35)       that the Revolution changed attitudes


regarding female education, although it


may have accelerated earlier trends.


Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-


       lican motherhood” thesis may have


(40)       obscured the presence of these trends,


making it difficult to determine to what


extent the Revolution really changed


women’s lives.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-7-Q10:


According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was


               



  • innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence

  • exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution

  • unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices

  • controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys

  • atypical in that it examined the education of girls

  • ===================================



    請問答案為什麼是B呢~


    line22說在K學者的作品出現以前,教育歷史學家很少提到女性教育的問題,


    但是T學者在1929的作品卻是個有名的例外,


    照這樣推斷,那麼應該暗示說T學者的作品有提到女性教育的問題,


    這樣答案應該是E阿,為什麼是B呢~~


    困惑阿~~


    謝謝解答~!!



    沙发
    发表于 2005-1-9 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
    I choose E too
    板凳
    发表于 2005-1-9 17:30:00 | 只看该作者
    我开始也选E的 后来看懂了 因为E说关注了女性的教育,但在后来有其他学者也关注到了 TW人的不同就在于他比人家早
    地板
    发表于 2005-1-9 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
    我开始也选E的 但后来看懂了 E说是关注女性教育 但后来的人也关注了 这个人的不同是他比别人早
    5#
    发表于 2005-1-9 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
    啊? 第一遍发成功的啊?系统乱提示嘛!
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 03:26
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部