ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2202|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 求助。快来看看吧

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-15 16:00:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?
A. Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
B. The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
C. Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
D. The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
E. The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.

答案是D。为何不是E。我们说反对者观点建立在怀疑E,即怀疑投递个数与考核邮递员效率是相关的 这个假设。  这么理解错哪了???
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-15 20:31:22 | 只看该作者
helppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-15 21:31:52 | 只看该作者
upppppppppppppppppppppp
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-15 22:36:33 | 只看该作者
upupppppppppppppppppp
5#
发表于 2013-8-15 22:37:14 | 只看该作者
题目的意思是:A认为,投递员投递的信越多说明能力越强。但这是错误的,因为衡量一个邮递员的工作质量是复杂的。因为万一信件丢了呢blahblah
D. The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
只重视数量不重视质量
E. The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.
能力与投递数量相关

注意题干不是在否定“即怀疑投递个数与考核邮递员效率是相关的 这个假设”啊,它是在否定只考虑数量不考虑质量的单一标准,它是在承认与数量相关的基础上加入质量的考虑。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 22:04:50 | 只看该作者
拧发条喵 发表于 2013-8-15 22:37
题目的意思是:A认为,投递员投递的信越多说明能力越强。但这是错误的,因为衡量一个邮递员的工作质量是复 ...

谢谢,美女~~~讲的很清楚~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部