- UID
- 1256255
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2017-1-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
[size=9.000000pt]In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the lesshealthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the changehas hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.[size=9.000000pt]Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?
A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.
B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.
C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.
D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.
正解是A 我选的C
前人给的解释A: all refreshments 的趋势衬托爆米花销量增加。但是我觉得,既然 argument 只针对爆米花的销量,那么A选项提到 all refreshments 销量如何变化的,就应该是无关选项啊
个人理解C选项:argument 是“电影院给出的 saying (我理解成原因) 是错的”,那么如果有其他原因导致电影院换回 coconut,就可以 support argument 了吧
求大神解答!!
|
|