ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profi ts. The size of the county's population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within fi ve years, and they are predicting solid profi ts both for themselves and for the established cinema operators.

Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justifi cation for the investors' prediction?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3843|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-8 08:07:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
14. In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profi ts. The size of the county’s population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are
investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within fi ve years, and they are predicting
solid profi ts both for themselves and for the established cinema operators.
Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justifi cation for the investors’
prediction?
(A) Over the next ten years, people in their teenage years, the prime moviegoing age, will be a rapidly growing
proportion of the county’s population.
(B) As distinct from the existing cinemas, most of the cinemas being planned would be located in downtown
areas, in hopes of stimulating an economic revitalization of those areas.
(C) Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, has been increasing modestly each
year for the past ten years.
(D) The average number of screens per cinema is lower among existing cinemas than it is among cinemas still
in the planning stages.
(E) The sale of snacks and drinks in cinemas accounts for a steadily growing share of most cinema operators’
profi ts.

我想请问下E选项是不是犯了绝对数值和相对数值的错误啊?如果把share去掉,而改成绝对数值的增加,可以对原文的结论进行加强吗?谢谢各位NN指导哈
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-8 08:48:57 | 只看该作者
No.

After the change of yours, E can bring more money for EXISTING cinemas, but not for FUTURE cinemas.
板凳
发表于 2013-5-10 16:30:58 | 只看该作者
求指教!!!
这道题B为什么不对呢????B说如果这些新增的屏幕都是在乡下,就会使以前不回去看定影的人选择区电影院看电影,这不是变相的说明看电影的 人数会增加吗?????
GMAC为什么会说这没有解释看电影的人数会增加呢?是我想多了吗?OG解释还说,乡下开电影院可能会把已有电影院的客人抢走,其实不是很有力吧。因为城市人不会放弃近的电影院而去乡下看电影呀!
求拍砖,求指教
地板
发表于 2013-5-10 16:32:11 | 只看该作者
这个帖子稍显年代久远,顶起来,求牛牛们指教!在下感激不尽!
5#
发表于 2013-5-10 16:34:14 | 只看该作者
sdcar2010 发表于 2011-4-8 08:48
No. After the change of yours, E can bring more money for EXISTING cinemas, but not for FUTURE cinem ...

你好,这位朋友,能否就我的问题继续解答一下那?谢谢啦~
6#
发表于 2013-5-12 01:59:34 | 只看该作者
牛掰 发表于 2013-5-10 16:30
求指教!!!
这道题B为什么不对呢????B说如果这些新增的屏幕都是在乡下,就会使以前不回去看定影的人 ...

Check the meaning of downtown. It is not 乡下 as you understood. It is 市中心, 闹市区.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 13:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部