不知道是不是我做题做的眼花了,这一题怎么会选D呢,不懂啊不懂,虽然我选B也貌似有点irrelevant.
GWD6-Q14: support Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that werelost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than wereeliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than theaverage pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughoutDelmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadilybigger. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens theargument in the advertisement?
- [url=]The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.[/url][C1]
- [url=]Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.[/url][C2]
- [url=]Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.[/url][C3]
- [url=]The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.[/url][C4]
- [url=]The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.[/url][C5]
[C1]thiscomparison only compare the average pay of the jobs created, do it can notstrengthen the argument
the ten year low average pay does not mean theaverage paycheck has been getting bigger. [C2]
[C4]Correct. Ifthe average pay for jobs eliminated is significantly higher than average pay,although there are new jobs created, the average paycheck in the city may stilldecrease.
[C5]Irrelevant comparison.
|