ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Most employees in the computer industry move from company to company, changing jobs several times in their careers. However, Summit Computers is known throughout the industry for retaining its employees. Summit credits its success in retaining employees to its informal, nonhierarchical work environment.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Summit's explanation of its success in retaining employees?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1894|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助OG13第52题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-3-26 00:40:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Most employees in the computer industry movefrom company to company, changing jobs several times in their
careers. However, Summit Computers is known throughout the industry for retaining its employees. Summit
credits its success in retaining employees to its informal, nonhierarchicalwork environment.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Summit's explanation of its success in retaining
employees?
(A) Some people employed in the computer industry change jobs if they become bored with their
current projects.
(B) Ahierarchical work environment hinders the cooperative exchange of ideas that computer industry
employees consider necessary for their work.
(C) Many of Summit's senior employees had previously worked at only one other computer company.
(D) In a nonhierarchical work environment, people avoid behavior that might threaten group harmony and
thus avoid discussing with their colleagues any dissatisfaction they might have with their jobs.
(E) The cost of living near Summit is relatively low compared to areas in which some other computer
companies are located.

好吧,这是一个老题,看过了各种解释,说一下自己的理解,请教一下诸位到底哪里不到位
首先,argument是informal, nonhierarchical work environment帮助Summit留住了员工,这一点应该没有问题吧?然后 B和D各种解释我都基本同意,唯一的问题是,B说是hierarchical work environment会妨害交流导致员工无法完成工作,但是完全没说nonhierarchical不会啊? 还是说,在逻辑题里,对于A和非A的对比,A的弱点非A一定没有? 这个不太合理吧? 另外一个关于B的问题,B的逻辑链应该是这样的hierarchical work environment-> no exchange of ideas-> couldn't do work-> employee to quite,这里面最后一环完全是假设吧?好像既不是充分也不是必要?为什么这个是成立的?最后假设OG的权威性不容质疑,那我我可不可以这么理解,如果argument是A can do B because C, 那么证明non-C will cause A couldn't do B就是加强?  
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-3-26 10:26:04 | 只看该作者
我也是新人,请问您一下这个论坛更新了以后是不是没有办法像原来一样搜索人家求助过的帖子?
板凳
发表于 2013-4-4 22:48:52 | 只看该作者
YangCyini 发表于 2013-3-26 10:26
我也是新人,请问您一下这个论坛更新了以后是不是没有办法像原来一样搜索人家求助过的帖子? ...

可以搜索的 在FORUM PORTAL那一排导航键的下面
地板
发表于 2013-4-4 22:51:22 | 只看该作者
你的逻辑链很清楚很正确,你说最后一环是假设的,没错。因为这是SUPPORT题,不是AAUMPOTION题,是可以引入外来信息的。

然后这里确实就是either-or啊!就好像一个人不是男的就是女的,是女的能穿裙子,所以是男的就不能穿裙子。但你一定要说男的也可以穿裙子。。。。这个GMAC就没有办法了。。。。
5#
发表于 2013-4-5 02:33:56 | 只看该作者
这是support题,不是assumption题。正确选项不必严格地支持题干中的结论。
B选项讲了等级制工作环境的坏处,虽然没有没有讲非等级制工作环境的好处,但也勉强算是对非等级制工作环境的一种肯定吧。
对于一个support题来说,这就够了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 19:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部