ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Several of a certain bank's top executives have recently been purchasing shares in their own bank. This activity has occasioned some surprise, since it is widely believed that the bank, carrying a large number of bad loans, is on the brink of collapse. Since the executives are well placed to know their bank's true condition, it might seem that their share purchases show that the danger of collapse is exaggerated. However, the available information about the bank's condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company's condition. On balance, therefore, it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3082|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-12-33 请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-29 16:32:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-12-33 请教

Q33:


Several of a certain bank’s top executives have recently been purchasing shares in their own bank.  This activity has occasioned some surprise, since it is widely believed that the bank, carrying a large number of bad loans, is on the brink of collapse.  Since the executives are well placed to know their bank’s true condition, it might seem that their share purchases show that the danger of collapse is exaggerated.  However, the available information about the bank’s condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company’s condition.  On balance, therefore, it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example.






In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?






  1. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue that the argument addresses; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.

  2. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue the argument addresses; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument.

  3. The first provides evidence to defend the position that the argument seeks to establish against opposing positions; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.

  4. The first provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the argument’s main conclusion.  

  5. Each provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish.

答案是A,以前讨论都说因为有"on balance"及therefore,所以第二句是结论.



可是我怎么看 it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example. 这句话也不像是main conclusion. 难道说, 有可能总裁们正follow这个例子  就是他买股票的原因? 



this example 是指什么? 是指corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company’s condition 吗?



真是不明白,请大家解释!


沙发
发表于 2004-12-1 00:10:00 | 只看该作者
this example 是指什么?

我也觉得是指 corporate executives do
sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to
calm worries about their company’s condition

B  main conclusion是第二句粗体

第一句粗体是一个行为现象  后面有两种解释

1. the danger of collapse is exaggerated  

2. attempt to calm  worries

由最后一句可知   作者支持后者   

板凳
发表于 2004-12-4 12:34:00 | 只看该作者
同意楼上的.

on balance
: with all things considered

所以第二句BF是MAIN CONCLUSION.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 00:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部