ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2607|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG阅读:欢迎大家参与讨论并给予指点(OG-3)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-19 10:54:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG阅读:欢迎大家参与讨论并给予指点(OG-3)

我在总结考点的时候发现passage3中第13题问的是中心思想,第18题问的又是primary object。


请问:第一,二者的区别是什么?(因为要我看其实质一样,都是主题型考点)


         第二,从OG给出的正确答案看,是否将13题和18题的答案综合起来就是本文的主题概


                   括?如果还不是,那么NN是否可以给出主题概括?


请大家帮忙解答,谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-30 22:13:47编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-11-19 16:16:00 | 只看该作者

将文章和问题、解释贴出,供大家研究。看不出太大的区别。


可能ETS只是想让我们知道主题题可以有不同的提问和选项方式吧。第一问的选项是句子,第二问是句子的后半部分,以动词开始。同时,有点感觉是,第一问是主要内容,第二问是中心思想,虽然第一问用central idea, 第二问用primary objective。


哈哈,有点像小学课本的问题啊,我小学到高中的语文就没学好,对不起语文老师。到了gmat这里终于有机会补补课了。可能不仅仅是补习,还学到了原先学不到的东东吧。还是请大家再看看吧。也许哪位当过小学老师,可以解答。



Passage 3


Federal efforts to aid minority businesses began in the



1960’s when the Small Business Administration (SBA)



began making federally guaranteed loans and govern-



ment-sponsored management and technical assistance



(5) available to minority business enterprises. While this



program enabled many minority entrepreneurs to



form new businesses, the results were disappointing,



since managerial inexperience, unfavorable locations,



and capital shortages led to high failure rates. Even 15



(10) years after the program was implemented, minority



business receipts were not quite two percent of the national



economy’s total receipts.



Recently federal policymakers have adopted an



approach intended to accelerate development of the



(15) minority business sector by moving away from directly



aiding small minority enterprises and toward supporting



larger, growth-oriented minority firms through interme-



diary companies. In this approach, large corporations



participate in the development of successful and stable



(20) minority businesses by making use of government-



sponsored venture capital. The capital is used by a



participating company to establish a Minority Enterprise



Small Business Investment Company or MESBIC. The



MESBIC then provides capital and guidance to minority



(25) businesses that have potential to become future suppliers



or customers of the sponsoring company.



MESBIC’s are the result of the belief that providing



established firms with easier access to relevant manage-



ment techniques and more job-specific experience, as



(30) well as substantial amounts of capital, gives those firms



a greater opportunity to develop sound business founda-



tions than does simply making general management



experience and small amounts of capital available.



Further, since potential markets for the minority busi-



(35) nesses already exist through the sponsoring companies,



the minority businesses face considerably less risk in



terms of location and market fluctuation. Following



early financial and operating problems, sponsoring



corporations began to capitalize MESBIC’s far above



(40) the legal minimum of $500,000 in order to generate



sufficient income and to sustain the quality of manage-



ment needed. MESBIC’c are now emerging as increas-



ingly important financing sources for minority enter-



prises.



(45) Ironically, MESBIC staffs, which usually consist of



Hispanic and Black professionals, tend to approach



investments in minority firms more pragmatically than



do many MESBIC directors, who are usually senior



managers from sponsoring corporations. The latter



(50) often still think mainly in terms of the “social responsi-



bility approach” and thus seem to prefer deals that are



riskier and less attractive than normal investment criteria



would warrant. Such differences in viewpoint have pro-



duced uneasiness among many minority staff members,



(55) who feel that minority entrepreneurs and businesses



should be judged by established business considerations.



These staff members believe their point of view is closer



to the original philosophy of MESBIC’s and they are



concerned that, unless a more prudent course is fol-



lowed, MESBIC directors may revert to policies likely



to re-create the disappointing results of the original SBA



approach.






13. Which of the following best states the central idea of the passage?



(A) The use of MESBIC’s for aiding minority entrepreneurs seems to have greater potential for success than does the original SBA approach.



(B) There is a crucial difference in point of view between the staff and directors of some MESBIC’s.



(C) After initial problems with management and marketing, minority businesses have begun to expand at a steady rate.



(D) Minority entrepreneurs wishing to form new businesses now have several equally successful federal programs on which to rely.



(E) For the first time since 1960, large corporations are making significant contributions to the development of minority businesses.






18. The author’s primary objective in the passage is to



(A) disprove the view that federal efforts to aid minority businesses have been ineffective



(B) explain how federal efforts to aid minority businesses have changed since the 1960’s



(C) establish a direct link between the federal efforts to aid minority businesses made before the 1960’s and those made in the 1980’s



(D) analyze the basis for the belief that job-specific experience is more useful to minority businesses than is general management experience



(E) argue that the “social responsibility approach” to aiding minority businesses is superior to any other approach






13.



A is the best answer. The passage begins by indicating that the results of the SBA approach to aiding minority entrepreneurs “were disappointing” (line 11). Lines 62-64 state that “MESBIC’s are now emerging as increasingly important financing sources for minority enterprises.” Much of the passage is devoted to supporting the author’s view that MESBIC’s have the greater potential for success, and the last sentence in the passage confirms this view.


18.



B is the best answer. The passage describes efforts undertaken in the 1960’s to the minority businesses and then describes MESBIC’s , a newer approach to such efforts.






[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-22 23:51:43编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-20 17:30:00 | 只看该作者

还是Wangyu GG想得比较周到,谢谢!


各位NN赶紧看过来呀,帮忙出出主意啊

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-22 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

啊?怎么没有人回答啊?郁闷啊......

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-25 14:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wangyu73cn在2004-11-19 16:16:00的发言:

将文章和问题、解释贴出,供大家研究。看不出太大的区别。


可能ETS只是想让我们知道主题题可以有不同的提问和选项方式吧。第一问的选项是句子,第二问是句子的后半部分,以动词开始。同时,有点感觉是,第一问是主要内容,第二问是中心思想,虽然第一问用central idea, 第二问用primary objective


哈哈,有点像小学课本的问题啊,我小学到高中的语文就没学好,对不起语文老师。到了gmat这里终于有机会补补课了。可能不仅仅是补习,还学到了原先学不到的东东吧。还是请大家再看看吧。也许哪位当过小学老师,可以解答。


wangyu GG恐怕我不能苟同你的意见啊。我认为:第13题是问中心思想,人家用central idea是有道理的,第18题是问文章的主旨,换句话说就是写这篇文章的主要目的,因此人家才会用objective这个词。从实质上讲,这两个问题的侧重点是不一样的,虽然同属于主题题型。不知wangyu GG以及各位NN是否同意我这种说法?


还有一点,wangyu GG觉得这个是小学或者初中语文问题那就对了。我们现在学GMAT不就是在学语文吗?只不过是英语语文罢了。仔细想想,分析文章结构、归纳每段大意、提炼中心思想、找主题句、分析句子结构、语法改错、写作文等等,不都是我们从小学开始一直到中学的语文课的内容吗?我们就是通过准备GMAT考试提高自己对英语语言的综合运用能力,这样才可以到了学MBA的时候不至于对着那一堆一堆的、有可能是自己从来没有接触过的专业材料苦不堪言了。


总之,还是要谢谢wangyu GG的帮助。这段时间我反复琢磨这两道题,今天看到他的新comments以后突然有了新思路,就把想到的都写下来了,请各位指正。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-25 14:07:50编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-11-26 14:54:00 | 只看该作者

我也认为这两道题目问的都是主题型,但侧重点不一样。如果仔细看过og的rc部分最前面的内容,也就是buddyk推荐的rc总纲,对主题型的出题方式会有所了解。

至于为什么一篇文章会出两道类似的题目,我的理解是,og的题目是从题库里抽出来的,而题库里面同种类型的题目可以有好几种不同问法的,所以碰到类似的题目就很正常。如果做过xdf的补充教材的题目,就会发现类似的题目更多。

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-26 16:04:00 | 只看该作者
感谢流沙版主的指点!
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-26 16:04:53编辑过]
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-29 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

还有一个关于og 3的问题

我还想补充问一个问题:各位认为这篇文章(og 3)从具体套路来讲,是属于哪一类?(新老观点对比型、现象解释型、问题解决型、结论解释性?)这个我有点拿不准。


谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-29 15:06:18编辑过]
9#
发表于 2004-11-29 21:04:00 | 只看该作者
新老观点,确切的说是新老做法对比
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-30 10:02:00 | 只看该作者
有道理,谢谢skidals指点!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 01:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部