ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1285|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG-173 OG-174题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-23 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG-173 OG-174题

Joseph Glarthaar’s Forged in Battle is not the first excel-


lent study of Black soldiers and their White officers in the


Civil War, but it uses more soldiers’ letters and diaries—


including rare material from Black soldiers—and concen-


(5) rates more intensely on Black-White relations in Black


regiments than do any of its predecessors. Glathaar’s title


expresses his thesis: loyalty, friendship, and respect among


White officers and Black soldiers were fostered by the


mutual dangers they faced in combat.


(10 ) Glarthaar accurately describes the government’s discrim-


inatory treatment of Black soldiers in pay, promotion, medi


cal care, and job assignments, appropriately emphasizing


the campaign by Black soldiers and their officers to get the


opportunity to fight. That chance remained limited through


(15) out the war by army policies that kept most Black units


serving in rear-echelon assignments and working in labor


battalions. Thus, while their combat death rate was only


one-third that of White units, their mortality rate from


disease, a major killer in his war, was twice as great.


(20) Despite these obstacles, the courage and effectiveness of


several Black units in combat won increasing respect from


initially skeptical or hostile White soldiers. As one White


officer put it, “they have fought their way into the respect


of all the army.”


(25) In trying to demonstrate the magnitude of this attitudi-


nal change, however, Glarthaar seems to exaggerate the


prewar racism of the White men who became officers in


Black regiments. “Prior to the war,” he writes of these


men, “virtually all of them held powerful racial prejudices.”


(30) While perhaps true of those officers who joined Black


units for promotion or other self-serving motives, this state-


ment misrepresents the attitudes of the many abolitionists


who became officers in Black regiments. Having spent


years fighting against the race prejudice endemic in Ameri-


(35) can society; they participated eagerly in this military


experiment, which they hoped would help African Americans


achieve freedom and postwar civil equality. By current


standards of racial egalitarianism, these men’s paternalism


toward African Americans was racist. But to call their


(40) feelings “powerful racial prejudices” is to indulge in


generational chauvinism—to judge past eras by present standards.




173. Which of the following best describes the kind of error


attributed to Glarthaar in lines 25-28?


(A) Insisting on an unwarranted distinction between two


groups of individuals in order to render an argument


concerning them internally consistent


(B) Supporting an argument in favor of a given interpretation


of a situation with evidence that is not particularly


relevant to the situation


(C) Presenting a distorted view of the motives of certain


individuals in order to provide grounds for a negative


evaluation of their actions


(D) Describing the conditions prevailing before a given


event in such a way that the contrast with those


prevailing after the event appears more striking than it


actually is


(E) Asserting that a given event is caused by another event


merely because the other event occurred before the given


event occurred




174. Which of the following actions can best be described as indulging in “generational chauvinism” (lines 40-41) as


that practice is defined in the passage?


(A) Condemning a present-day monarch merely because many monarchs have been tyrannical in the past.


(B) Clinging to the formal standards of politeness common in one’s youth to such a degree that any relaxation of


those standards is intolerable


(C) Questioning the accuracy of a report written by an employee merely because of the employee’s gender.


(D) Deriding the superstitions accepted as “science” in past eras without acknowledging the prevalence of


irrational beliefs today.


(E) Labeling a nineteenth-century politician as “corrupt” for engaging in once-acceptable practices considered


intolerable today.



这两题看得我晕忽忽,文章不难,但象173这样的题目抓本质抓不住,而且选项看得也有些饶,请高人帮忙分析和解释一下,哪怕精确翻译一下选项也好,谢谢。


沙发
发表于 2004-11-24 12:55:00 | 只看该作者

为什么楼主取这么一个具有封建色彩的名称啊。我生气了,不想看题目了。

哈哈,其实我暂时没时间,有空再帮你看看。不过你如果想改名,我可以和老大商量商量,帮你改一下。当然如果你觉得这名字挺好,我只好自己生闷气了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 07:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部