ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner's yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2993|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助~GWD-TN-2的逻辑一道~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-24 12:43:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD3-Q17:
Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply.  By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.  A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism:  For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

答案说是选B,可我越看越觉得B不对,我觉得选E,大家来谈谈建议和自己的想法吧~帮我看看这道题到底是怎么回事~谢谢~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-24 18:41:42 | 只看该作者
在排除选项的时候,首要的是抓住题目的主旨,也就是题目里实的东西,扔掉虚的
题目里在讨论的是新旧landscaping能否省钱
E有一个毛病是句子中出现了some,some导致可以提供可信依据的basis很小不足以convincing, 这类选项首先就可以扔掉
再看其他选项A\C\D中只有D的内容沾边,但可惜是无关比较
最后看B,B说旧的landscaping会导致用户消耗更多化肥,这就和省钱这个概念搭边了,因此使得Brochure的讲法更加persuasive,从而驳斥Criticism的讲法
希望对你有帮助
板凳
发表于 2013-3-5 23:00:48 | 只看该作者
同意楼上的

Brochure说Water-Conserving landscape 省钱
Criticism说w-c landscape并没有省多少水费

选一个削弱Criticism的
ACE都和在讨论w-c省钱没关系的

B实际说了w-c landscape比常规的landscape省钱的地方
D说w-c landscape没有比常规的贵 不能削弱criticism 所以选B
地板
发表于 2013-3-7 04:35:44 | 只看该作者
如果把 rebuttal 去掉的话,D就可以做一个正确答案了,D与A比较更贴近原文的核心cost, rebuttal 是问题很关键的一个词,不然忽略了就容易误选D
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 13:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部