[求助][讨论]feifei 75

75. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

Conclustion is the advertisers morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. But I think answer C. shows that advertisers' financial considerations rather than moral motivation. I can't understand the answer and chose A.  lease help!

再重新考虑了Ｃ，可不可以这样一来理解：　ＡＤＶＥＲＴＩＳＥＲＳ　宁可ＳＡＬＥＳ减少，也要ＷＩＴＨＤＲＡＷ，这样一来就能体现他们的ＭＯＲＡＬ　ＣＯＮＳＩＤＥＲＡＴＩＯＮ．　我对The changed publication 理解有偏差，这里的Ｔhe changed publication 也就是ＡＤＶＥＲＴＩＳＥＲ　要　ＷＩＴＨＤＲＡＷ的．

只是，我还是觉得Ａ　也能ＳＵＰＰＯＲＴ答案．请多多指点！

For A, the advertisers in A may need to appeal some family-oriented audience. This is still profit oriented.