IR 例题求解

manni7298 · 发表于 2020-5-13 00:31:19

请问如果去理解statement (1), 看了好几次题目还是没看懂.

Professor A的主张是救助行业应当开始限制在贫困地区小学、医药和其他健康用品和一些重要农业计划的支出。
答案A：救助行业应当较当前减少聚焦于健康和农业－教授支持
答案B：救助行业应当比当前更关注小学教育－不是应该不支持这个观点吗？
答案C：救助行业应当比现在更少的关注在小学教育的投入－不是应该支持这个观点吗？

Professor A: The aid industry should begin to limit its efforts to spending on primary schools in the poorest areas, providing medicines and other basic supplies for health such as mosquito nets, and to a few key agricultural initiatives.
Professor B: Much education work has been ineffective. A village or town with poor schooling may be better off getting a road than a teacher. Once local farmers can transport produce to market they will be willing to pay for schools—and to make sure the schools succeed.
Suppose that the professors' statements express their genuine opinions. Select statements (1) and (2) as follows: Professor A would likely disagree with (1) and Professor B would take (2) to present logical support for (1). Select only two statements, one per column.

Your answer

	(1)	(2)
A			The aid industry should focus less on the areas of health and agriculture than it now does.
B			The aid industry should focus more on primary education than it now does.
C			The aid industry should focus its spending less on primary education than it now does.
D			Projects in health and agriculture are more likely to be successful if they are not paid for by the aid industry.
E			Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid for by the aid industry.
F			Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid for by local people.

[备考心经] IR 例题求解

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()