ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2108|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD11逻辑题求解~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-14 22:36:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturers implement a program with well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division’s hazardous waste was 90 pounds per production worker, last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer’s program has not met its goal are false.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
  1. the amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1984

  2. at least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994

  3. since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

  4. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

  5. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
答案给的是E 可是我觉得E取反后是人数变少那没有削弱原文结论啊 人均和人数都变少 总量当然变少啦 为啥选E啊求教!!!!





  1. the amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1984

  2. at least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994

  3. since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

  4. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

  5. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
答案给的是E 可是我觉得E取反后是人数变少那没有削弱原文结论啊 人均和人数都变少 总量当然变少啦 为啥选E啊求教!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-11-15 10:32:53 | 只看该作者
The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

E选项的意思是:1994年分配到PJ的人不少于去年分配到PJ的人数,也就是说去年分配到PJ的人数不多余1994年分配到PJ的人数。人均少于一半了,人数只要保证不多于1994年,那总数不就一定小于1994吗?

按你的说法,E取反应该是1994年分配到PJ的人少于去年分配到PJ的人数,是人数变多了,而不是你说的人数变少了。正好理解反了。估计你是吧less in 1994理解成了less than 1994了,如果有种先入为主的感觉确实很容易弄错,我开始也是像你这么理解的。如果把in 1994提到前面去就很清楚了,than 后面才是less比较的对象。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-15 17:29:18 | 只看该作者
哦哦好的明白啦!谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 08:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部