ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3294|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12,CR的43题,不是很懂,求解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-9-1 10:20:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
43. Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to
Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more
than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that
can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B) Northern Power can choose from among various kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective
than others.
(C) Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D) Harmful emissions from Northern Power’s plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together
than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E) Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not
cause signi?cant air pollution.


答案选的是D,这是为什么呢?OG上面的解释我觉得有些模棱两可,各位麻烦在帮我解释下吧,对OG答案接受不能呀。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-9-1 11:07:57 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate D), you have:
Harmful emissions from Northern Power’s plants CAN be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
If that is the case, then the conclusion "by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants" is wrong since, apparently, there is a better reduction method by combined the two methods together.

Hence, D) is the necessary assumption.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-1 11:26:09 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate D), you have:
Harmful emissions from Northern Power’s plants CAN be reduced more by using both methods together
than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
If that is the case, then the conclusion "by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that
can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants" is wrong since, apparently, that is a better reduction method by combined the two methods together.


Hence, D) is the necessary condition.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/9/1 11:07:57)




3Q,我发现是我自己把D的意思理解错误了,谢谢啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 23:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部