A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
(A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
(B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
(C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
(D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.A
(E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
原文逻辑链:首先政府取消减免,从而导致高帅富捐赠不能避税,推出结论慈善机构要跪。 我认为的gap:1.高帅富就是冲着incentive去的。2. 慈善机构的生存依赖于高帅富 所以为了填补这块空白。 观看正确答案A,只表现了1,也就是高帅富爱incentive 观看我认为正确的答案B,既用一个从句满足了1:捐款的高帅富和普通大众都爱incentive,而且满足了2:这些冲着incentive去的捐款是慈善机构的唯一来源。不应该是B更加对么?
|