ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3954|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-9-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-17 15:42:00 | 只看该作者

天山-9-10


Ecoefficiency (measures


to minimize environmental


impact through the reduction


Line or elimination of waste from


(5) production processes) has


become a goal for companies


worldwide,withmanyrealizing


significant cost savings from


such innovations. Peter Senge


(10) and Goran Carstedt see this


development as laudable but


suggest that simply adopting


ecoefficiency innovations could


actually worsen environmental


(15) stresses in the future. Such


innovationsreduceproduction


waste but do not alter the num-


ber of products manufactured


nor the waste generated from


(20) their use and discard; indeed,


most companies invest in eco-


efficiency improvements in


order to increase profits and


growth. Moreover, there is


(25) no guarantee that increased


economic growth from eco-


efficiency will come in similarly


ecoefficient ways, since in


today’s global markets,


(30) greater profits may be turned


into investment capital that


could easily be reinvested


inold-styleeco-inefficient


industries. Evenavastly


(35) moreecoefficientindustrial


system could, were it to grow


much larger, generatemore


total waste and destroy more


habitat and species than would


(40) a smaller, less ecoefficient


economy. Senge and Carstedt


argue that to preserve the


global environment and sustain


economic growth, businesses


(45) must develop a new systemic


approach that reduces total

material use and total accu-

mulated waste. Focusing


exclusivelyonecoefficiency,


(50) which offers a compelling


business case according


to established thinking, may


distract companies from


pursuing radically different


(55) products and business


models.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q10:


According to the passage, an exclusive pursuit of ecoefficiency may cause companies to



A. neglect the development of alternative business models and products


B. keep the number of products that they manufacture unchanged


C. invest capital from increasedprofits primarily in inefficient and outmoded


industries that may prove unprofitable


D. overemphasize the production process as the key to increasing profits and growth


E. focus more on reducing costs than on reducing the environmental impact of


production processes


Answer:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


答案选A.我觉得定位在这里


Focusing


exclusivelyonecoefficiency,


(50) which offers a compelling


business case according


to established thinking, may


distract companies from


pursuing radically different


(55) products and business


models.


这个意思好像是和A相反的。请指点。

沙发
发表于 2005-3-1 13:05:00 | 只看该作者

"distract.....from " here means "neglect"

板凳
发表于 2005-3-2 14:59:00 | 只看该作者

F2 has hit the point.

When you say "X distracts someone from Y", you somewhat mean "X lets someone neglect Y"...

地板
发表于 2006-8-17 10:14:00 | 只看该作者

B为什么不对呢

Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured

5#
发表于 2006-11-20 14:19:00 | 只看该作者
up!
accept A. But why not B?
6#
发表于 2007-10-12 10:07:00 | 只看该作者

AB都能找到定位啊

我还是觉得B对

最后说的是distract from radically应该不等于neglect

请妞妞出来解释一下这题吧,前人没解释~

7#
发表于 2008-4-3 17:51:00 | 只看该作者
B不是“exclusive pursit”的结果(定位不准)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-29 18:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部