ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 818|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家帮忙看看这月寂静这道语法题应该选哪个?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-17 08:22:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
18Responding to the public's fascination with-and sometimes undue alarmover-possible threats from asteroids, a scale developed by astronomers ratesthe likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A. a scale developed by astronomers ratesthe likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developedrates how likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale torate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale forrating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale thatrates the likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-17 08:30:06 | 只看该作者
我选择D
1.  修饰语和主语要一致: 所以responding to ....必须是某个人,而不是a scale,所以排除A.B
2. Likelihood的修饰, 是撞击的可能性,不是某个名词Asteroid(不认识)的可能性,所以排除E
3. C中的how likely.....will be to..的用法很奇怪,很容易排除

所以选择D. 不知道有没有正确答案。
板凳
发表于 2012-8-17 08:34:18 | 只看该作者
我觉得选c....
地板
发表于 2012-8-17 08:55:18 | 只看该作者
我选C
首先分句以resonpding开头,很显然,主句要找到它的逻辑主语,排除A,B
E也很好排除,that从句做定语修饰asteroid or comet,使得句子变成了asteriod or comet的概率,而不是他们撞击地球的概率,改变逻辑意思。
C选项正确,to do表达目的时比D选项的for doing要清晰,并且这里will be to不是连在一起看的,是(how
likely the asteroid or comet will be) to....相当于sth/sb is likely to do的用法。
5#
发表于 2012-8-17 09:19:52 | 只看该作者
说什么的都有。Manhattan 上说是D, 但争议很大
6#
发表于 2012-8-17 09:25:41 | 只看该作者
i think D
7#
发表于 2012-8-17 10:05:04 | 只看该作者
我选C
首先分句以resonpding开头,很显然,主句要找到它的逻辑主语,排除A,B
E也很好排除,that从句做定语修饰asteroid or comet,使得句子变成了asteriod or comet的概率,而不是他们撞击地球的概率,改变逻辑意思。
C选项正确,to do表达目的时比D选项的for doing要清晰,并且这里will be to不是连在一起看的,是(how
likely the asteroid or comet will be) to....相当于sth/sb is likely to do的用法。
-- by 会员 MINOZ芸 (2012/8/17 8:55:18)







正解
8#
发表于 2012-8-28 20:51:06 | 只看该作者
google了一下原文,NYTIMES上的,我认为还是d,c 从语法说没错,尤其是be likely to do的用法,但是感觉rate how likely不如rate the likelyhood自然,d 更贴近原作者的表达。



Astronomers Adopt Doomsday Index
By ANAHAD S. O'CONNOR
Published: July 27, 1999
SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
PRINT

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

A 0 indicates that there is no chance of impact and a 10 means certain catastrophe on the scale, which was endorsed on July 22 by the International Astronomical Union.

The scale was created by Dr. Richard P. Binzel, professor of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is named the Torino Impact Hazard Scale, after the Italian city in which it was first proposed.

The major benefit to the scale is that it can be used by both the scientific community and the public in determining the likelihood of an impact, Dr. Binzel said. ''Scientists haven't done a very good job of communicating to the public the relative danger of collision with an asteroid,'' he said, adding that he hoped the scale would help astronomers ''clearly inform but not confuse or unnecessarily alarm the public.''
9#
发表于 2012-8-28 22:11:53 | 只看该作者
哎=  =说了那么多越来越不知道选什么了,但是要我选还是选C吧。For实在太奇怪了,也没有找到任何for的用法。Provide是不算的,provide本来就是provide sth for sb...
10#
发表于 2012-8-28 23:52:41 | 只看该作者
感觉d
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 08:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部