ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1359|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] ISSUE 47(教育者应当开设学生们想上的课) 求您PIA......

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-19 19:16:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


Which kind of curriculums should be included by educators in students’ class? There are some people arguing that educators should learn from students, and offer curriculums which students welcome to the students. As far as I am concerned, by doing this students will be more willing to study, and this could also offer chances to students to develop their hobbies. However, this institution may also bring about some subjects which have no use to the students.

Above all, I think that to offer students curriculums that they like in the class could bring about more and more students to school. The reason is intelligible. For example, some students may like to study math, some of them are fond of physics, and some others like to study music, dancing, or P.E. class. If educators only offer math and physics, which they think is of most value, to the students, those who are fond of art may loose heart to study. And hobbies are surly good teachers. When students are doing what they like to do, they will more possibly focus their attention on the classes, and then do well in their works.

What’s more, to offer students different kinds of curriculums will surly widen their vision of the society. If students only take some basic subjects in the class, they will have no knowledge about other things which are crucial to make up the whole complicated society. Furthermore, different curriculums will also be useful to improve students’ function of brain. Einstein, a physical giant who is famous all of the world, was also good at playing the piano. It is physics as well as art that made him be such a smart scientist. So it may be good to take different curriculums in the class.

However, some kind of curriculums, although may be welcomed among students, could never be brought to the class, because this subjects may do harm to the students’ daily study. For example, many students are addicted to radio games, and surly they are willing to bring this kind of subject to school. But there is no possibility to do it, since the school is a place in which students must study, but not a net bar. Although this could develop students’ passion to go to school, to get this class may have no use for students’ further study. So when educators learn from students about the curriculums they like, the educators should also analyze those subjects more carefully.

So from all the arguments issued above, I could draw a conclusion that to add some subjects which are welcomed among students could bring some advantages to the education, but when doing such a job, educator should learn carefully about which subjects could be taken into class and which ones could not.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-19 20:07:15 | 只看该作者
However, this institution may also bring about some subjects which have no use to the students.
??没用还要干嘛?
板凳
发表于 2012-8-19 20:09:56 | 只看该作者
The reason is intelligible. For example,我觉得这样不是很好的论述,既然你谈到了reason,就应该去分析推理出reason,而不要跟着就是例子。用例子来推理理由是不好的,而应该使用理由来支撑例子,因为这样的理由,才有这样的例子。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-19 20:24:31 | 只看该作者
啊~~~ no use 表达错了那个。。。
我也是觉得这个例子举得有点。。突兀了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-8 00:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部