ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2573|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-4 23:01:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?

(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.

(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.

(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their inability to regenerate themselves naturally.

(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.A

(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies.



这题选A还是没有看懂,这道题如何说明inhibors主要功能并不是阻碍神经重生,它还有其它更重要的作用。如果使ngi失去活力了,它其它的功能无法完成,
我知道CD上有这题,但是不知道为什么回复了顶不上去,所以就自己发帖求解算啦。希望大家帮忙。这题想了很久.我选了B
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-5 10:40:55 | 只看该作者
有NN解答吗
板凳
发表于 2010-7-14 12:25:37 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-51216-1-52.html
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-16 00:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部