ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1730|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有没有大神帮忙解决一下这题逻辑题(发在逻辑区没人鸟我)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-5-23 12:49:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Advertising by mail has become much less effective, with fewer consumers responding. Because consumers are increasingly overwhelmed by the sheer amount of junk mail theyreceive, most discard almost all offers without considering them.Thus, an effective way for corporations to improve response rateswould be to more carefully target the individuals to whom theymail advertising, thereby cutting down on the amount of junkmail each consumer receives. Which of the following, if true, would most support therecommendation above?

(A) There are cost-effective means by which corporationsthat currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.

(B) Many successful corporations are already carefullytargeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.

(C) Any consumer who, immediately after receiving anadvertisement by mail, merely glances at it, is very likely todiscard it.

(D) Improvements in the quality of the advertising materialsused in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improvethe response rate for such mail.

(E) Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements bymail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates tomost other forms of advertising
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2017-5-23 12:51:10 | 只看该作者
答案是E选项。。。 但是怎么能拿MAIL的 REPONSE和其他方式的广告比?

假设其他方式的广告形式,如电视,网络,average REPONSE RATE是0.2。  而MAIL广告原本就是0.5, 你carefully targed adverstisement 没有用,反而变成了0.28.  这仍然 considerably higher on average,  than response rates to most other forms of advertising.  怎么证明加强原文观点。 improve response rates?

OG解释说,这句话提供了证据证明targed mail advertising 比 untargeted mail advertising 高,所以他证明了观点的正确
板凳
发表于 2017-5-23 13:14:01 | 只看该作者
欧文市长 发表于 2017-5-23 12:51
答案是E选项。。。 但是怎么能拿MAIL的 REPONSE和其他方式的广告比?

假设其他方式的广告形式,如电视,网 ...


地板
 楼主| 发表于 2017-5-23 14:15:20 | 只看该作者
Un-known 发表于 2017-5-23 13:14
OG解释的没有错啊 这个是英文表达习惯的关系 所谓的most other form 是指not carefully targeted的广告  ...

真的是这样吗
5#
发表于 2017-5-23 14:22:13 | 只看该作者
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2017-5-23 14:34:38 | 只看该作者

哎,逻辑开始做正确率还有挺高,题刷的越多反而考虑越多,正确率下降了。
7#
发表于 2017-5-23 15:07:30 | 只看该作者
Thus, an effective way for corporations to improve response rates would be to more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising, thereby cutting down on the amount of junk mail each consumer receives.
楼主仔细看要加强的结论句。最有效的去提升“回复率”的办法就是去精确定位客户,从而减少用户收到的垃圾邮件。mail自然可以和其他的办法比,如果其他的办法比这个的回复率更高呢,加强的选项就说这是最高的。当然这种逆向解释只适用于说明逻辑链,考试的时候建议用对比的方法做。第一眼排除bc,彻底的无关项,d仅仅是在重复文中的话,逻辑链上的gap没有填补,这种选项经常用来做干扰项。个人觉得最干扰的是a,在读题的时候很容易被这种选项搅晕,但是其实a仅仅是d的加强版,也就是仅仅是在重复文中的话,没有在逻辑链上有加强,如果有,也仅仅是轻微的加强。而e是可以真正加强文章结论的选项。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 15:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部