If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing andparkland will need to be used in order to create morespace. Charging each household a fee for each poundof trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above? (A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by reducing the number of products they buy. (B) The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of most residents, even if their house holds do not reduce the amount of trash they put out. (C) The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally. (D) The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the county’s residents. (E) Landfills outside the county’s borders could be used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.
很多CDer对A选项有争议，我表示搜了很久的帖子看到的做法都是关键字排除，然后研究了很久，终于发现了一点区别了 题目上述的逻辑是费用引起人们创造垃圾的减少（the amount of trash they create），然后这样就能得出结论：费用能保护parkland A选项是说费用引起了人们所要倒的垃圾（the amount of trash they put out），注意题目所说的创造的垃圾和这里的要倒的垃圾有个gap，即创造的垃圾=要倒的垃圾+（人们自己处理的垃圾） 然后采取百试百灵的假设取非削弱，即使A选项人们所要倒的垃圾真的变多了或者没变，只要人们自己处理的垃圾增多了，这个等式依旧可以是减少的，个人觉得用数学等式来解释比较容易理解一开始觉得OG官方解释很扯淡很晦涩，其实编书者还是很牛的，这样C就很正确了， 以上都是代表个人观点，求专家拍砖
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-12-24 17:59:35
一开始觉得OG官方解释很扯淡很晦涩，其实编书者还是很牛的
，这样C就很正确了，
收藏
收藏
