ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3552|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG35-杨继62-大全62-218

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-30 00:01:00 | 只看该作者

OG35-杨继62-大全62-218



  Two divergent definitions have dominated sociologists’


  discussions of the nature of ethnicity. The first emphasizes



  the primordial and unchanging character of ethnicity. In


  this view, people have an essential need for belonging that


(5) is satisfied by membership in groups based on shared


   ancestry and culture. A different conception of ethnicity



   de-emphasizes the cultural component and defines ethnic



   groups as interest groups. In this view, ethnicity serves as


   a way of mobilizing a certain population behind issues


(10) relating to its economic position. While both of these


   definitions are useful, neither fully captures the dynamic


   and changing aspects of ethnicity in the United States.


   Rather, ethnicity is more satisfactorily conceived of as a


   process in which preexisting communal bonds and common



(15) cultural attributes are adapted for instrumental purposes


   according to changing real-life situations.


     One example of this process is the rise of participation


   by Native American people in the broader United States


  political system since the Civil Rights movement of the


(20)1960’s. Besides leading Native Americans to participate


   more actively in politics (the number of Native American



   legislative officeholders more than doubled), this movement


   also evoked increased interest in tribal history and traditional


   culture. Cultural and instrumental components of


(25 )ethnicity are not mutually exclusive, but rather reinforce


   one another.




???***218/1. Which of the following best states the main idea of the passage?



          内容性主题题



(A) In their definitions of the nature of ethnicity, sociologists have underestimated the power



of the primordial human need to belong.



(B) Ethnicity is best defined as a dynamic process that combines cultural components with



shared political and economic interests.






(C) In the United States in the twentieth century, ethnic groups have begun to organize in



order to further their political and economic interests.



(D) Ethnicity in the United States has been significantly changed by the Civil Rights



movement.



(E) The two definitions of ethnicity that have dominated sociologists discussions are incompatible and should be replaced by an entirely new approach.  &









218.




OG:This question asks you to identify the statement that best expresses the main idea of the passage.



The best answer is B. The passage defines ethnicity and provides examples to illustrate how



ethnicity is a “process” that combines cultural concerns with the “shared political and economic



interests” mentioned in choice B.


Choice E is



not correct because although the passage suggests a new conception of ethnicity, there is no



indication that the other definitions discussed are incompatible with each other.





???B的Political 出现在很隐蔽的第19, 怎么一眼就看出来呀?我注意力主要都放在第一段了, 总想找到同意替换的句子, 谁知这道题是要自己高度概括的, 郁闷ing, 要考试时遇到它, 我肯定没时间想了.前十题就更惨了!


考试的时候怎么迅速定位呀? 真要理解全文才行啊?



我做了几次都选了E, 被L6给迷住了, 唉, 谁能帮忙解释一下,前两个观点不是incompatible 的呢?






[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-30 0:08:37编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-7-30 04:57:00 | 只看该作者
While both of these

   definitions are useful, neither fully captures the dynamic

   and changing aspects of ethnicity in the United States.

   Rather, ethnicity is more satisfactorily conceived of as a

   process in which preexisting communal bonds and common

(15) cultural attributes are adapted for instrumental purposes

   according to changing real-life situations.

从这边可以看出作者把两种definion合为一种process

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-11 12:13:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢狗狗指点!
地板
发表于 2005-3-11 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
文章脉络就是说对民族性有两种理解,后来分析美国将这两种理解合并为一个共同过程。这就是文章的主要线索。因此文中总是围绕两方面进行:一方面讲经济功利性,一方面讲传统民族特性。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-11 13:32:00 | 只看该作者

wangyu GG刷贴好快亚, 真佩服GG, 能一下从 interest groups 看出是经济功利性.

我是今天看了GG的 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=74687&page=1

才彻底明白的. 这是我最头痛的文章了.  仅从一个 different  就判断是incompatible , 我也太武断了.

谢谢GG

6#
发表于 2005-6-15 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cocoabean在2005-3-11 13:32:00的发言:

wangyu GG刷贴好快亚, 真佩服GG, 能一下从 interest groups 看出是经济功利性.


我是今天看了GG的 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=74687&page=1


才彻底明白的. 这是我最头痛的文章了.  仅从一个 different  就判断是incompatible , 我也太武断了.


谢谢GG



一点不同:


interest groups 应该是指"利益团体","利益"包括经济利益,也还有政治利益




7#
发表于 2005-6-15 15:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chinayeanson在2005-6-15 11:24:00的发言:



一点不同:


interest groups 应该是指"利益团体","利益"包括经济利益,也还有政治利益






确实如此。应包括经济和政治利益。谢谢。
8#
发表于 2005-10-8 19:31:00 | 只看该作者

斑竹,我对219的OG解释有疑问,看不明白,你能帮我看看吗?


The two definitions are contrasted in the passage as well as in choices A, B, and C, but there is no information in the passage to suggest that the definitions are different in any of the specific ways mentioned in these choices.


这个怎么理解呢?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 01:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部