ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of fi nished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of fi nished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2683|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD28-Q32 BF题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-5 11:00:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD28-Q32:
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company’s failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products.  It is doubtful whether an investor’s sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified.  It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton’s case it indicates no such thing.  Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.


In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.我选的A~
正确答案为C
文中 citing as evidence the company’s failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products这一句明显是用来support the position being opposed的~,然后BF2说这个不成了,不是就恰好是A选项吗?
C中说BF2是conclusion,可是我认为conclusion应该是the company is not mismanaged啊~
又钻牛角尖了。。。
求指导
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-6-7 20:02:10 | 只看该作者
文中 citing as evidence the company’s failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products这一句明显是用来support the position being opposed的~,然后BF2说这个不成了,不是就恰好是A选项吗?

No. BF2 refers to the sentence right before it: It is doubtful whether an investor’s sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive.

The whole argument is about "a prominent investor's claim" and the reason he/she cited for the claim.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 11:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部