- UID
- 957659
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
不会发图>>>>
Prep2012-Pack1-CR-055 VCR07635 Hard
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?----------------------提问为演绎推理问法?
分析:
they are often said to be more productive (果)if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? (因)
What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?(CQ? 因果概括? 由于因特 也就是service qualify的问题 导致因 无法致果 )
A. Postal workers are representative of service workers in general. Postal 是service worker的一种
B. The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
C. Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
D. The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
服务质量 可以被忽略 在 电脑计算的 productivity中。
E. The numberof letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.
主要是对题目的分类不清晰 求问 是因果还是 演绎 (演绎是否会有这种问法 因为感觉从选项倒推CQ只能是 演绎) |
|