ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (RFGP)

00:00:00

Some people have questioned the judge's objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1911|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 44

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-5 15:27:00 | 只看该作者

og 44

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

 

The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

 

A. a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women

C. the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination

D. the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court

E. the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women

 

44.

The flaw in the argument is that is assumes erroneously that a majority of decisions favorable to women in sex discrimination cases demonstrates absence of discriminatory behavior against women on the part of the judge who made those decisions. E exposes this flaw by pointing out that the judge may well have failed to decide in favor of women in cases where evidence shows that the women should have won. Therefore, it is the best answer.

 

A and D have no bearing on the reasoning of the argument, because the origin of the cases is not at issue in the argument. B and C introduce considerations with no bearing on the reasoning of the argument. Because the argument concerns a particular judge, and cases of a particular type, B and C are inappropriate.

 

请教B为什么不对啊?

沙发
发表于 2006-8-5 22:29:00 | 只看该作者

B and C introduce considerations with no bearing on the reasoning of the argument. Because the argument concerns a particular judge, and cases of a particular type, B and C are inappropriate.

To make it simple, B and C bring up something that has nothing to do with the argument, which focus on the judge himself. Hence, B and C are not related.

板凳
发表于 2012-4-14 19:40:29 | 只看该作者
不懂啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-27 09:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部