- UID
- 619993
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-29
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
i think we should compare difference BF in the same argument:
TTGWD11-Q32:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A.The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B.The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
C.The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
D.The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion.
E.The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.
答案是C
GWD10-Q17:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A.The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.
B.The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C.The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D.The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
E.The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.
OA: B (From GWD)
我们应该讨论这两个！ |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-3-12 17:32:31
收藏
收藏
