ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 719|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求2道GWD的逻辑题 看不懂啊!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-28 07:54:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Political Advertisement:


Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.


Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?


  1. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.[C1]
  2. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.[C2]
  3. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.[C3]
  4. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.[C4]
  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.[C5]
答案是D 完全不明白 为什么。。
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


  1. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.[C1]
  2. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.[C2]
  3. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.[C3]
  4. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.[C4]
  5. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.[C5]




答案A为什么不可以呢。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-28 08:41:18 | 只看该作者
First one:新增工作多与丢失的工作;新增工作工资高于平均共资=>每年总的平均工资是增长的
GAP就是关于丢失工作的工资
A:无关比较;要注意结论是什么;结论是说D的任期内怎么怎么…;跟上任相比是无意义的
B:无关
C:有一些新增的工作同时又丢失了;其实这对原文结论产生不了影响;文中说“the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide ”,不管你这些新的工作是怎么产生的,反正新工作的工资比平均水平要高;C好像想从前提里面作文章,但无效
D:丢失的工作工资与每年平均工资水平持平,那就排除他因削弱
E:城市郊区比较,out of scope
板凳
发表于 2012-2-28 08:46:26 | 只看该作者
second one:GWD解析原文:答案是D, 可我选的是B, 我觉得B是削弱, D是加强. 不知对不对?
You made a typical mistake: you did not make clear what the conclusion is.
The conclusion is whether the approach has encouraged the saving. If the conclusion is that everyone will benefit, B will be the answer. Think again, hard.
结论是:吸收了特殊存款,计划成功
A:A是建立在计划成功的基础上的;应该是无关
B:Mindfree说的很彻底;B属于compatible
C:严重无关
D:与原意相悖,削弱
E:好像跟A的毛病一样,无关
以上是GWD给出的解析,但是我做的时候也是选的B。LZ自己定夺吧~
地板
发表于 2012-2-28 10:15:09 | 只看该作者
第二题我也选b,看来错了
5#
发表于 2012-2-28 10:51:21 | 只看该作者
sencond one: 选D Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts

结论: encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings 提高L市民的储蓄量

D的意思就是把原来长期账户里的钱挪到这个特殊账户了。也就是总的存款量是没有变化的,变化的只是两个账户。所谓拆东补西,其实没有变化。

不知道说清楚了没有。
6#
发表于 2012-2-28 14:31:08 | 只看该作者
B为什么不对?thx~
7#
发表于 2012-2-28 14:57:44 | 只看该作者
新方案的目的是to increase the amount of money they put into savings,B选项workers能不能take advantage of special saving accounts与方案的目的无关,而D选项说明the amount of money they put into savings would not increase
8#
发表于 2012-2-28 15:03:38 | 只看该作者
B为什么不对?thx~


我觉得plan是为了increase account 而无论是though workplace 还是though government 都是在account中的,不影响结果与PLAN无关,如果无利率贷款能增加saving的话那这部分though workplace的钱也会增多,总之最后account的saving 增多了,反而加强了结果
个人见解,不知对否,请NN指教
9#
发表于 2012-2-28 15:21:02 | 只看该作者
题二:
条件:提供免税以增加S账户的储蓄
结论:提高L市民的储蓄量
逻辑S账户储蓄增加--》整体储蓄量增加

D---满足条件但不能得出结论 (S账户储蓄增加,整体储蓄量不变)--》削弱
B---不满足条件 (人们把钱投到公司提供的优惠税收账户了,没钱投政府的了,S账户储蓄不变)-- 无关
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-14 14:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部