ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5142|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat5(2)的一道假设

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-15 14:48:00 | 只看该作者

lsat5(2)的一道假设

12. The more television children watch, the less competent they are in mathematical knowledge. More than a third of children in the United States watch television for more than five hours a day; in South Korea the figure is only 7 percent. But whereas less than 15 percent of children in the United States understand advanced measurement and geometric concept, 40 percent of South Korea children are competent in these areas. Therefore, if Untied States children are to de well in mathematics, they must watch less television.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Children in the United States are less interested in advanced measurement and geometric concepts than are South Korea children.

(B) South Korea children are more disciplined about doing schoolwork than are children in the United States

(C) Children who want to do well in advanced measurement and geometry will watch less than television.

(D) A child’s ability in advanced measurement and geometry increases if he or she watches less than one hour of television a day.

(E) The instruction in advanced measurement and geometric concepts available to children in the United States in not substantially worse than that available to South Korea children.

假设题目,当时作题的时候我没有分开C选项和E.答案是E.我觉得C是假设,E是一个加强。

请各位高手指点
沙发
发表于 2003-6-15 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
我认为答案应该是E
文中认为美国儿童看电视多是造成其数学能力差的原因,文中的暗含假设就是没有其他的原因造成美国儿童数学能力差。
答案E指出在教育上美国儿童不比韩国儿童差,该选项排出了他因,所以正确。
而C我认为最好也就是个加强。想要在数学方面最的很好的儿童将会看很少的电视。只能说明看电视可能是儿童数学差的原因,所以只能是个加强。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-6-15 17:43:43编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2003-6-15 19:01:00 | 只看该作者
同意LINLIN的意见。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-15 22:10:00 | 只看该作者
但是,你把C取非再看看:想要在数学方面最的很好的儿童不需要少看电视。那么原文的结论就不成立了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-16 12:42:00 | 只看该作者
ding
6#
发表于 2003-6-16 16:57:00 | 只看该作者
1stzhang,你就把这题记住了不就行了吗?以后有这题类型的都选,就可以了.
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-16 18:39:00 | 只看该作者
不可以的,这个题目的答案我认为是有问题的
8#
发表于 2003-6-16 20:35:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得问题在于看题上:
Children who want to do well in advanced measurement and geometry will watch less than television是说想要在数学方面做的很好的儿童将会看很少的电视。就算你取非又能说明什么呢??也是指想要在数学方面做得好的儿童不需要少看电视。但是问题是想要做得好就一定做得好吗??如果改成children who do well in advanced measurement and geometry watch less than television我认为就对了!!你看呢??
以下是引用1stzhang在2003-6-15 22:10:00的发言:
但是,你把C取非再看看:想要在数学方面最的很好的儿童不需要少看电视。那么原文的结论就不成立了



[此贴子已经被作者于2003-6-16 20:35:51编辑过]
9#
发表于 2003-6-16 20:38:00 | 只看该作者
ding是什么啊???
以下是引用1stzhang在2003-6-16 12:42:00的发言:
ding
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-16 22:34:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢linlin
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 18:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部