[讨论]LSAT-3-22 再次讨论

麻集爱 · 发表于 2004-3-30 12:42:00

22. In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other, "father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one
that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?
(A) the children did not grasp the function of rolling pin.
(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.
Page 9/9 Edited by Gmatstart
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.
(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins
我看过了原来的解释，但还是倾向于A 。LSAT的提干一般措辞严谨，很少有没用的话，请注意：前面说到父亲叫擀面杖，儿子就用擀面杖，但是！！！---- 后面当被要求拿擀面杖的时候，儿子们只挑出自己用过的擀面杖。请注意这个“但是”意思转折，　千句话我们推出应该是儿子听了擀面杖三个字，理解了这个词所代表的的用处，所以（在很多的厨具中）只拿擀面杖用，接下来，　为什么用“但是”呢？那些孩子听到擀面杖　的时候　（在很多擀面杖中)只拿了自己用过的的擀面杖．　着说明儿子们没有真正理解擀面杖的作用，要是理解了这三个字的意义就会根据命令拿任意一个面杖。
希望战友讨论　谢谢

snow_mountain · 发表于 2004-3-30 13:57:00

E？

weiyu · 发表于 2004-3-30 15:31:00

B; 仔细再想想, 没问题

snow_mountain · 发表于 2004-3-30 15:35:00

是欧。这题我还做到的呢。真是昏。

rhod · 发表于 2004-3-30 17:31:00

原文是说当father说rolling pin时，孩子们只拿自己用过的，说明并不知道其他孩子用的也是rolling pin. B对。

但是不能说明孩子们不知道the function of rolling pin. 如果要说明这点，应该在原文中提到孩子们拿着rolling pin不会用之类的证据。A不对。

madtears · 发表于 2004-3-30 19:47:00

关键是repeat,体会一下，就好比把声音和实物结合。

[讨论]LSAT-3-22 再次讨论

[讨论]LSAT-3-22 再次讨论

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()