ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1441|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解一道prep07的题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-19 21:14:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Companies O and P each have the same number of employeeswho work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees ofCompany O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees ofCompany P.  Therefore, employees ofCompany O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees ofCompany P.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken theconclusion?
(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work dueto job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.
(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to bejob-related than did Company O.
(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often thanwere the employees of Company O.
(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than onejob-related accident.
(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company Oinvolved a single machine.
这道题我选了B, 我总感觉D和事故数量无关,起不了削弱作用。请大神们解答一下我的困惑

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-9-20 19:56:24 | 只看该作者
EMMMM那啥,我的prep上怎么答案是B。。。

不管了,跟LZ分析一下这个题吧:

Argument:
P1: O P两企业员工数量一样,工作时间一样
P2:O的工伤比P的少
C:O的员工 less likely to have accidents than P的员工

A:P的员工因为工伤损失了更多的时间。只讨论宏观的工伤率的问题,未说明与工作时间缩短的关系。
B:P将更多的accident看成了工伤。也就说P的工伤数据虚高,有可能O工伤 > P工伤。可以选。
C:P的员工比O的员工更容易生病。与A类似,P1明确给出了前提(工时一样长,员工一样多),生不生病没有关联。
D:一些O的员工很背时,多次受工伤。但我觉得这个并不能动摇O的工伤数量少的事实。它只给出了微观的分布情况,但我们需要知道的是宏观的总量。因此我觉得这个选项没有关联。
E:O的工伤与一台机器有关。同D,只给出了微观的工伤分布情况,但这里讨论的是总数。

综上,我也想选B。
板凳
发表于 2018-9-22 01:51:42 | 只看该作者
菜鸟想说这题绝对b
楼上分析很到位了
地板
发表于 2020-7-6 10:49:22 | 只看该作者
这题蛮奇怪的,我一开始认为工伤按照各公司定义所以没得选,其实工伤是有一个客观存在不为公司主观意见所转移的,那就选b了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 03:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部