According to OG: E is wrong because:The mere lack of current production facilities does not mean that it would be inadvisable to develop and use the spray in the future. However in my opinion, I think E is not the right answer, because it contradict the premise stimulus: cause enzyme can kill all the pests that go though a caterpillars stage, conclusion: enzyme should be used to eradicate pests potential assumption: there are enough synthesized enzyme For E: there is no enzyme ---> So it is wrong But I am not sure whether there are some flaws in my reasoning, If so, please corret me``thanks a lot! -- by 会员 mia113 (2011/7/28 14:49:24)
整个argument的conclusion是itwouldNOTbeadvisabletotrytoeradicate agriculturalpeststhatgothroughacaterpillarstagebysprayingcroplandswiththeenzymementionedabove |