ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1829|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat一道推理题/LSAT-2-2-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-29 11:06:00 | 只看该作者

lsat一道推理题/LSAT-2-2-15

A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity tours with playing tours led to problems, so she stopped combining the two. She no longer allows bookstore appearances and playing in competition to occur in the same city within the same trip. This week she is traveling to London to play in a major competition, so during her stay in London she will not be making any publicity appearances at any bookstore in London.



Which one of the following most closely parallels the reasoning used in the passage?



(A) Wherever there is an Acme Bugkiller, many wasps are killed. The Z family garden has an Acme Bugkiller, so any wasps remaining in the garden will soon be killed.



(B) The only times that the hospital’s emergency room staff attends to relatively less serious emergencies are times when there is no critical emergency to attend to. On Monday night the emergency room staff attended to a series of fairly minor emergencies, so there must not have been any critical emergencies to take care of at the time.



(C) Tomato plants require hot summers to thrive. Farms in the cool summers of country Y probably do not have thriving tomato plants.



(D) Higher grades lead to better job opportunities, and studying leads to higher grades. Therefore, studying will lead to better job opportunities.B



(E) Butter knives are not sharp. Q was not murdered with a sharp blade, so suspect X’s butter knife may have been the murder weapon.


我的思路:1)A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity tours with playing tours led to problems,


2)so she stopped combining the two.


3) She no longer allows bookstore appearances and playing in competition to occur in the same city within the same trip.


4)This week she is traveling to London to play in a major competition,


5)so during her stay in London she will not be making any publicity appearances at any bookstore in London


三段论:


1)前提->2)中间结论(大前题)


3)和4)为事实和前提(小前题)


5)(结论)


A是否错在any上了


沙发
发表于 2004-7-29 21:07:00 | 只看该作者

lsat一道推理题/LSAT-2-2-15

原文逻辑:两个互相矛盾的事情(一个出现,另一个不出现),因为一个出现,所以另一个不出现。

A的两件事不是矛盾关系,而是IF。。THEN。关系。B才是矛盾关系。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-6 21:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部