OG书上critical reasoning问题。。。

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-18 20:25:58

20. In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
(E) Because the traditional wooden sleds can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

我没看懂标红的问题是什么意思啊？求翻译~谢谢各位！

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-18 20:44:38

亲爱的们。。。求翻译，再顶~

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-18 20:58:41

啊呀，我先自问自答下啊，求纠正啊，标红主要意思是：以下什么观点对文章论据的引用最具有破坏力？？
The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago.
C是说，塑料雪橇比木质雪橇应用更加广泛，因为广泛了，所以会导致受伤人的数量增加
--------------
我怎么感觉自己分析的有点奇怪呢。。。。。。。。。求更正。。。。。。。。。。。。

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-18 23:32:35

顶顶顶！！

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-19 14:12:16

duanmu0828 · 发表于 2013-8-19 15:37:48

其实就是削弱的意思啦，哪一个选项能最大程度削弱结论？

gracewang.yulin · 发表于 2013-8-19 17:08:21

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
以下选项，如果属实（in Verland），哪一个最能削弱题目中论据的说服力。
undermine是削弱的意思。

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-19 17:42:56

gracewang.yulin 发表于 2013-8-19 17:08
Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cite ...

亲！那么题目中论据就是The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago.这个对吧？削弱对数量这个论据吧？我理解对么？

gracewang.yulin · 发表于 2013-8-19 18:00:50

the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago
就是这个，亲，你用的是12版OG么？

godgod777 · 发表于 2013-8-19 20:33:35

gracewang.yulin 发表于 2013-8-19 18:00
the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago
...

我用的是13版的。。。应该一样的吧。。。？

OG书上critical reasoning问题。。。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()