ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1902|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] 解释题求助!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-6 14:39:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States.  The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline.  However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.
Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding?
(A) Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.
(B) Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products other than beverages.
(C) Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers..
答案是C。B为什么不对?C怎么推出来的文章说glass bottles重量下降百分比大于aluminum cans,C中plastic container文章没出现过,无关选项?而且如果替换成plastic containers跟glass bottle就没关系了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-9-6 14:46:38 | 只看该作者
替换成plastic containers了 所以glass bottle减少了 所以有关
板凳
发表于 2013-9-6 16:21:53 | 只看该作者
文章中的线索是:garbage 的持续减小原因是由于beverage containers
因为beverage containers现在能回收了,所以总的garbage steadily减小
而答案B能推出什么呢?知道了 A cans基本都变成了beverage containers,而recycled的Glass 确不仅仅装beverage。 那么glass在garbage中下降的比率应该低才是啊,因为如果是装饮料,那就能无限的循环下去,就相当于没有这个垃圾,但是如果装的不是饮料,就造成了垃圾。 怎么可能glass很大一部分不装饮料,而产生的glass垃圾却下降的幅度更大呢? 所以B没有解释原文,反而给出了更加让人感到困惑的理由。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-7 15:25:40 | 只看该作者
欧了。谢谢大家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-23 10:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部