- UID
- 667743
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-9-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.
2.Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?
(A) The percentage of voters registered as independents is higher today than ever before.
(B) In a recent presidential campaign, for the first time ever, an independent candidate was invited to appear in a televised debate with the major-party candidates.
(C) Every current member of the U.S. Senate was elected as the candidate of one of the two major parties.
(D) In a recent opinion poll, most voters stated that a candidate’s party affiliation was an insignificant factor in judging his or her fitness for office.(C)
(E)In the last four years, the outcome of several statewide elections has been determined by the strength of the third-party vote. 这道题的正确答案是C,我第一遍做的时候迷迷糊糊的选了B,后来多看了几遍题干,看懂了意思,但是还是不知道B错在哪儿。 B说独立候选人第一次登上了电视节目,就证明很多年的主流都不是独立候选人,是two major parties~~two major parties并没有要消亡,不刚好也增强了结论么~~
百度,google了都好像没有人有这个疑惑,特此来问问~~~~ 拜谢啦~~~
|
|