- UID
- 1191019
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-2-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?
(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.
(E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.
OA:D
这道题看最后半句有点没看明白。
美元下跌时因为关于明年经济增长会趋缓的预测。但是这个预测本来不会影响美元如果没有政府的预算赤字,预算赤字因此被减少来防止美元下降。
所以,预算赤字减少是政府的防止美元下跌的策略,但是正是这个策略才导致的美元下跌的反效果?
预算赤字能说减少就减少吗?
|
|