ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their field at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies' finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have aged but rather that scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: E

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4307|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

菜鸟求证,术语Argument 在 OG12 102/117 中的作用

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-9-24 00:04:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
NN们说:An argument is a conclusion supported by premises and assumptions. It has 3 parts: Conclusion, Premise and Assumption. argument可以解释为一个论证,是一个由前提/假设推导出结果的过程。

我的疑惑是:在做OG的时候,多数时候Argument说的是整个论证,但是有的时候觉得argumet说的只是论点(结论)。

例子:

102. Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx’s comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

Q: The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
OG的解释说,这个提问等效于: Reasoning For which of the options would the consideration given best serve as an argument?

我的困惑是:这里的an argument,如果翻译成中文,是论证(包括前提,推论,结论)?还是就是论点(结论)?
我觉得从OG的解释上来说,似乎是作为论点(结论)的可能性大一些。Q: The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that,这个问题有点绕。我理解为:给出的consideration可以最好的支持作为论点的一部分。请问这样的理解正确吗?

117. Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their fi eld at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fi fteen years, the studies’ fi nding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have aged but rather that scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.
(B) The first is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument; the second is that position.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is that explanation.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a competing explanation that the argument favors.
(E) The first provides evidence to support an explanation that the argument favors; the second is that explanation.

题目中的In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? 这里的argument,如果翻译成中文,是论证,这个应该没什么问题。
我的困惑是:(E) The first provides evidence to support an explanation that the argument favors; the second is that explanation. the second is that explanation. 选项中的这个argument翻译成中文应该是什么?是整个论证?还是就是作者的主要观点?我觉得如果解释成为论证,似乎很别扭。而如果翻译成“作者的主要观点”,就很好理解了。但是这里的argument是“作者的主要观点”这个意思吗?

希望NN们指点一下!谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-9-24 02:29:27 | 只看该作者
If an argument favors something, then its main conclusion definitely favors the same thing. No need to bother with such nusance as the best Chinese translation. Think in English.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-24 23:21:28 | 只看该作者

Thanks.

I was bothered with some subtle difference. It is correct. No need to discern such details.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 14:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部