ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3502|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

抓狂的GWD逻辑。。。麻烦解释时也稍微把意思翻译一下,我完全看不懂啊。。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-14 21:52:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD7-Q27:
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.  The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

A.    !There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.
B.    There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.
C.    Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.
D.    Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
E.    There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.


那个段落的结论我完全理解不了啊。。。麻烦了~~谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-15 10:08:27 | 只看该作者
选A吧?说是一项工程是保修的,重修工作很让人满意,而初次修复的工作很不充足。(结论)这不是因为(公司的)技师缺乏竞争力,而是说重新修复的工作需要技师集中更多的精力,因此显得比第一次修复工作的质量更可靠。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-15 11:06:24 | 只看该作者
there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs

这句话我看了老半天还是没法理解啊。。。。到底该怎么理解呢??
地板
发表于 2011-7-15 13:24:57 | 只看该作者
there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs

这句话我看了老半天还是没法理解啊。。。。到底该怎么理解呢??
-- by 会员 雪梦儿 (2011/7/15 11:06:24)



直接拆掉,整个主干就是A level of concentration is elicited more reliably by rework jobs. 其他的都是浮云...嘿嘿··
5#
发表于 2011-9-17 16:41:57 | 只看该作者
顶楼上解释!很清晰
6#
发表于 2011-9-17 16:42:28 | 只看该作者
选A吧?说是一项工程是保修的,重修工作很让人满意,而初次修复的工作很不充足。(结论)这不是因为(公司的)技师缺乏竞争力,而是说重新修复的工作需要技师集中更多的精力,因此显得比第一次修复工作的质量更可靠。
-- by 会员 deifica (2011/7/15 10:08:27)



感谢翻译,终于理解了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 20:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部