ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2770|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒31-32 迷惑啊

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-17 18:26:00 | 只看该作者

狒狒31-32 迷惑啊

Questions 31-32

Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely are found on television talk shows, and it might be thought that this state of affairs is a product of the political agenda of the television stations themselves. In fact, television stations are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to capture the largest possible share of the television audience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appeal to large numbers of people. As a result, political opinions and analyses aired on television talk shows are typically bland and innocuous.

 

 

31. An assumption made in the explanation offered by the author of the passage is that
   

 

 

A.        most television viewers cannot agree on which elements of a particular opinion or analysis are most disturbing.

B.        there are television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing.

C.        each television viewer holds some opinion that is outside the political mainstream, but those opinions are not the same for everyone.

D.       there are television shows on which economic forces have an even greater impact than they do on television talk shows.

E.        the television talk shows of different stations resemble one another in most respects.

 

 

B is the best answer.

 

 

先抽象原文:TV station的政治talk show是受经济利益驱使,看谁能capture the largest possible viewers,而不是TV station’s political agenda,所以,TV station的政治Talk showbland and innocuous (柔和的和不得罪人的)。问explanationassumption

大部分viewer不能就opinion or analysis的哪部分最disturbing达成一致。能不能就most disturbing达成一致与收视率及bland and innocuous无关,并有一点weaken的味道。

tv reviewers拒绝看controversial and disturbingtalk show;这正好在“capture the largest possible viewers”与“bland and innocuous” 架了一座桥梁。So B is the best answer.

文章讨论的重点不是outside the political mainstream, 所以是无关项。

其他talk show economic forces无关。

different stations无关。

 

 

 

 

32. The explanation offered by the author of the passage makes the assumption that

 

 

television station executives usually lack a poli

A.         political agenda of their own

B.        bland and innocuous political opinions and analyses are generally in the mainstream

C.        political analysts outside the mainstream are relatively indifferent to the effect their analyses have on television viewers

D.       most television viewers are prepared to argue against allowing the expression of political opinions and analyses with which they disagree

E.        the political opinions of television station executives are not often reflected in the television shows their stations produce

 

 

the best answer is B.

 

 

A.      tv station executive is irrelevant to the explanation.

B.       Yes. Because “political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely found on tv talk show” , and at last the author concludes thatpolitical opinions and analysis aired on tv talk shows are bland and innocuous”

C.       The passage doesn’t infer “political analysts outside the mainstream are relatively indifferent”, but assumes that “it might be thought…. of tv station themselves”. So C is irrelevant to the explanation.

D.      This is a confusing choice. “Argue against” doesn’t indicate it will affect the tv viewers to see the talk show. It is the attitude, not the effect or result of this attitude. So it will not help the author to reason the conclusion.

E.       Obviously, “the political opinion of tv station executive” is not mentioned in this passage and we can’t evaluate this situation before we get some relative information. So it is irrelevant.

请问这两题的问法的含义有什么区别吗??


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/17 22:36:44编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-17 19:54:00 | 只看该作者
DDDDDDDDDDDD
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-17 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

没人来啊没人来 顶啊顶

地板
发表于 2009-8-18 00:21:00 | 只看该作者

这两个问法没区别啊

我想你的疑惑是 为啥同一个题会有两个不同的assumption吧 因为必要条件作为结论成立的前提 本身并不唯一

这其实很好理解 举个例子 前提:人都要吃饭 都要睡觉 结论:小王是个人 问assumption

1 小王要睡觉

2 小王要吃饭

这两个都是assumption


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/18 0:21:32编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-18 00:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用overthere33在2009/8/18 0:21:00的发言:

这两个问法没区别啊

我想你的疑惑是 为啥同一个题会有两个不同的assumption吧 因为必要条件作为结论成立的前提 本身并不唯一

这其实很好理解 举个例子 前提:人都要吃饭 都要睡觉 结论:小王是个人 问assumption

1 小王要睡觉

2 小王要吃饭

这两个都是assumption

了了! 谢谢~ 太牛了太牛了
6#
发表于 2011-9-4 22:11:56 | 只看该作者
感觉这里第31题是假设而第32题是推断吧?第一个题是隐含的前提假设,第二题是通过原文信息平行推理得到,不知道这样感觉对不···
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 15:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部