ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4270|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep75 求助!——已解决

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-11 17:19:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
75[j1] .    (33198-!-item-!-188;#058&007254)



In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent.  In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent.  The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.  

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

A.[j2] During the second year after the tax increase, cigarette sales increased by a significant amount.

B. The information available to consumers on the health risks of smoking remained largely unchanged in the period before and after the tax increase.

C. Most consumers were unaware that the tax on cigarettes was going to increase.

D. During the year following the cigarette tax increase, many consumers had less income, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than they had had in the previous year.

E. During the year after the tax increase, there was a greater variety of cigarettes on the market than there had been during the previous year.

答案是B

问题:A为何错?B好像与原题没有什么关系?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-11 19:38:19 | 只看该作者
有没有高手可以帮我解答一下?!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-11 21:47:56 | 只看该作者

找到前辈高手解答

推理思路:税上升,导致烟的价钱上升,导致销量减少。要加强的是,加税后的烟价上升导致销量减少。
A. During the second year after the tax increase, cigarette sales increased by a significant amount.  加税后的烟价上升导致销量上升了。削弱(同因异果)
B. The information available to consumers on the health risks of smoking remained largely unchanged in the period before and after the tax increase.  消费者们得到的信息没变,排除他因。加强。

原帖:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-382280-1-1.html?SearchText=新prep 75
地板
发表于 2011-4-12 18:18:12 | 只看该作者
排除他因 加强?我怎么没看懂= =
我再看看
5#
发表于 2011-7-25 15:46:45 | 只看该作者
是排除他因。。。但是LS头像好恐怖。。。
6#
发表于 2011-8-16 10:46:46 | 只看该作者
是排除他因。。。但是LS头像好恐怖。。。
-- by 会员 cappuccino202 (2011/7/25 15:46:45)



A和D都是排除它因  但这里是应该分清整个逻辑链的问题
题目说是因为 tax的上涨  sales的下降 才------>aftertax price对sales有很大影响~~
而其实质的逻辑链 就是 tax的上涨 对after tax price的影响~~
所以A说的是 排除了 pretax price上涨的可能~~其实pretax price上涨了 aftertax price当然也就上涨了...



差不多这个意思~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部