ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2855|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-2-2-22

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-23 11:37:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-2-2-22

Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate form this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.


22.   Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT:


(A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade.


(B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years as for the past ten years.


(C) Evidence suggests that bronchial inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to irritation by airborne pollen.


(D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures.


(E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment.

答案是A,我觉得A和C都不支持
原文说死亡率提高,所以跟population无关,所以A是无关选项
C提到花粉,原文也没有指出对花粉敏感跟死亡率的关系,所以C也是无关选项

沙发
发表于 2004-6-23 12:20:00 | 只看该作者

字太小了,重新贴一下:

Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate form this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.

22.   Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT:

(A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade.

(B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years as for the past ten years.

(C) Evidence suggests that bronchial inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to irritation by airborne pollen.

(D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures.

(E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment.

答案是A,我觉得A和C都不支持
原文说死亡率提高,所以跟population无关,所以A是无关选项
C提到花粉,原文也没有指出对花粉敏感跟死亡率的关系,所以C也是无关选项

板凳
发表于 2004-6-23 12:25:00 | 只看该作者
阅读理解错了,并不是花粉敏感跟死亡率的关系,而是这种bronchial inhalers 加重了病人对花粉的敏感性,这样就为原文的推理提供了一个例证。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-23 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
Bronchial inhalers加重了对病人对花粉的敏感程度又怎样呢?不能说明敏感程度提高就会提高asthma的死亡率啊
5#
发表于 2004-6-23 13:16:00 | 只看该作者
晕,我觉得应该是common sense吧,你说呢?
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-23 13:19:15编辑过]
6#
发表于 2012-6-22 15:35:27 | 只看该作者
Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate form this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.
尽管哮喘的治疗有所提高,但过去十年中因哮喘致死的死亡率翻倍。两个有可能的解释是:第一,在过去10年中哮喘致死的记录更普遍也更精确;第二,城市污染增加。但是,即使在那些有悠久的良好医疗和无污染记录的城市中,因哮喘而致死的死亡率亦大幅提高,因而我们必然得出结论——死亡人数增加的原因是为了减缓哮喘的支气管吸入器的使用。

Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT:
以下哪个不支持上述结论:

(A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade.
过去10年中城市人口增加翻倍

(B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years as for the past ten years.
过去10年哮喘致死的记录比过去20年精确

(C) Evidence suggests that bronchial inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to irritation by airborne pollen.
证据表明支气管吸入器导致肺对花粉更敏感

(D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures.
为了暂时缓解哮喘症状,支气管吸入器导致患者错过了更好的治疗

(E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment.
10年前没人用支气管吸入器来进行哮喘治疗

可见,本题的问题关键在于两点,首先,过去10年的记录是可信的,选项B说明了这一点;其次,支气管吸入器是罪魁祸首,选项C\D\E说明了这一点。而A点显然非常滑稽,“人数的翻倍”并不一定导致死亡率升高,而“人数的翻倍”与“死亡人数增加的原因是为了减缓哮喘的支气管吸入器的使用”更是驴头不对马嘴,显然本题就应当选A。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 11:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部