求一道逻辑题解答。。

bluemagic · 发表于 2011-8-3 20:16:38

The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.

Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

答案是A，但是怎么想也想不明白政府continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds，跟批判historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts到底有什么的关系求解答啊。谢谢大家

bluemagic · 发表于 2011-8-3 21:29:59

5555555555555没有人解答一下吗。。。

chasedream321 · 发表于 2011-8-3 21:38:33

economically sound pricing method 从节俭，经济的角度完善的方法
而A选项说的是过去存在ineffective use of fund，而接下来却还是要按照过去的定价购买即违反了economically sound

bluemagic · 发表于 2011-8-3 22:03:51

懂了，，，谢谢哦

求一道逻辑题解答。。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块