两道都错了。。。不好意思。。。

小黛安 · 发表于 2011-8-21 09:23:34

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.
19. Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.
20. The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.
(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.

小黛安 · 发表于 2011-8-23 02:08:35

vivienzju · 发表于 2012-2-18 21:23:41

同问……

kylinhtq · 发表于 2012-2-19 01:25:02

这题怎么这么奇怪都是只有一个叙述么 C A?

这题貌似是根据土层来判断时间的题目给的信息是中层土里找到的东西比要找的文明的东西晚

而上面的依据是根据土层来确定的，那么如果物品存在于土层的位置被其他因素所破坏，那么这个论证也就不成立了。。。。反正A最像答案

晓幻 · 发表于 2012-2-20 21:21:30

同意3楼……也觉得答案是 C A

根据相关性做的。。

第一题选项读下来感觉其他选项所说的事情都有些“发散”了，而那些发散的原文中没有说过。

第二题。。我一开始把A和C留下来了，后来觉得C在说这两块石头被发现怎样…文章里边没有谈到啊，发散了。而A的确很像GMAT逻辑的答案——先说一个无关的东西，后边再用一些修饰语把中心拉回到原文所描述的逻辑范围内！

两道都错了。。。不好意思。。。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()